Summary on KRAS mutation driven nsc lung cancer - a patient’s perspective Q# s2 }8 _& h' z- N
hhhdai
4 O: ~/ C+ P- L- b5 C# hOct. 31, 2015
4 M0 f" A3 f6 M" }: q
* P9 ]1 U) v- n+ |% ?The infamous KRAS is a common driver oncogene in NSCLC. In adenocarcinoma of the lung, it accounts for nearly 1/5 – 1/4 of all cases, next only to EGFR positive cases.
/ Z' F7 v5 K, N! v5 H8 }, {
) E2 X/ g* g& J B$ N: ^' ELack of targeted inhibition made KRAS positive NSCLC a very tough cancer to treat and prognosis rather poor. Fortunately since 2010, this is slowly but surely changing, as more and more inhibitors along the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway are discovered and made into human trials, with some already showed promising outcomes. / A, @/ i. @0 r, N( t* S" W Z
8 _1 w6 H6 n3 b' Z6 n3 ]5 a, {Here I summarized a number of targeted therapy trials relevant to KRAS in NSCLC, As always; I am a mere patient, with limited or no knowledge but lots of opinions and strong bias. So, be pre-warned, you might get real harm believing in the wrong guy, though the wrong guy never meant to do so.
( b3 I6 b" N: M) }3 e: P7 ^ F0 r. Z5 z9 W L7 z) h
1)
" y1 H' {' U! m9 p8 F6 D. `1 u3 UMEK inhibitor Trametinib, aka GSK1120212, by GSK. Commercial name is Mekinist
1 y; z' E' n" N8 ~$ P, E6 F: _7 j& a) |1 L9 J* Q
I list this one at 1st place, because it is an approved drug, which means you could get it prescribed off label for lung cancer. In 2013, FDA approved it for the treatment of melanoma with BRAF V600 mutated melanoma. RAF, as in BRAF is immediately downstream of (c- or v-) RAS oncogene (as in KRAS) signaling pathway, which in turn passes signal down to MEK kinases, so it is quite relevant to KRAS positive cancer.
7 d% M: m) n4 F! z) ^% P( j
1 B1 g4 L$ W- X2 A) aAlthough earlier clinical trials of Trametinib single agent showed its efficacy to be similar to that of chemotherapy agent docetaxel, improvement could come in further biomarker selection and in drug combination. It is said that KRAS G12C mutation in smokers had the best response to Trametinib, so I wonder if commercial gene tests nowadays provide detailed point mutation information. Also since a year ago, GSK started a combination trial using JAK2 inhibitor momelotinib and trametinib. Momelotinib is in phase 3 clinical trial for myelofibrosis, a type of blood cancer. Why does GSK want to inhibit JAK2, which seems has nothing to do with lung cancer? My guess is, momelotinib probably also has strong inhibition on TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1, which is a component of the NFkB pathway (accidentally relevant to my wustl project in the past). There have been clear indications in the literature that inhibition of TBK1, which cuts off an autocrine cytokine circuit, significantly blocks KRAS driven tumorigenesis. So, if my guess is right, or shall I say, if GSK betted right, we might see a long-legged (or -footed?) improvement in KRAS positive NSCLC therapy. At this point I have not seen or heard any data from GSK’s combo trial of momelotinib and trametinib. $ _2 z% D# n1 E3 d1 }: Z
1 Q3 s& v4 b7 h' ^9 {# hNCT02258607+ g# u( z& @9 U$ w" c6 u: t
Efficacy and Safety of Momelotinib Combined With Trametinib in Adults With Metastatic KRAS-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Have Failed Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Preceded by a Dose-finding Lead-in Phase K7 N5 f5 ~7 X# i( i$ ?' l- E
NCT019126255 }& P' w6 b7 Z7 z% H' J0 F4 X
Trametinib, Combination Chemotherapy, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients with Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
# P0 B8 n+ C2 B; z( ?: b9 G% Q; [ d; S4 K2 C8 b: d
2)' O! {& g" D% I4 ?! ?
MEK inhibitor Selumetinib, aka AZD6244, by AZD.
; t4 v4 N1 Q; \8 b; J( O& p# y4 p2 J+ d+ Z: a. _/ i, X
Well, Selumetinib is the most famous KRAS path inhibitor as of today, especially outside US. As early as 2012 ASCO, the then AZD6244 already received attention worldwide for its superiority over docetaxel in KRAS positive NSCLC from phase 2 results. Understandably, it was AZD6244 + docetaxel vs docetaxel alone. So, I would say, not a terrific design, but clearly there was survival advantage for AZD6244. Their phase 3 trial worldwide has been ongoing since 2013, and it’s exactly Selumetinib + docetaxel vs placebo + docetaxel. 8 J$ N+ O7 R Z* P/ F3 q+ j* g
% J ~+ u! N( C; ]! k2 JNCT01933932 – worldwide phase 3, randomized
2 j2 t. S# C" m% b- q+ F( g" W+ q# q6 lAssess Efficacy & Safety of Selumetinib in Combination with Docetaxel in Patients Receiving 2nd Line Treatment for v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Positive NSCLC (SELECT-1)
, D9 ~2 ^9 s) ]4 T! _$ e4 c5 ^3 p( L+ v; S. t5 ^0 }& ~
AZD, a global pharma giant, like a rotten-rich gambler, spares no chance in collecting from all bets, no matter what the odds. Look at what they have put out for NSCLC: . F( [$ _! I# a. s
# m: b7 @/ L, o9 ENCT01586624 – combo with Vandetanib, an approved thyroid cancer drug by AZD, which inhibits VEGFR, EGFR and RET kinase. My question is, why? I don’t see any apparent synergism in the combo of VEGFR-TKi and MEKi. OK maybe you know more? Please correct me.
/ _! }) Q, J- A" I V+ g$ S8 XA Phase I Trial of Vandetanib (ZD6474) and Selumetinib (AZD6244)for Solid Tumours Including Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (VanSel-1)
; r4 _4 }% t" I/ M* h: r) jNCT02025114 – combo with iressa. Oh, how inspirational?6 `0 }3 Y" H" x4 a' a
Selumetinib in Combination With Gefitinib in NSCLC Patients
4 V! j0 B) [5 B: n) PNCT01750281 - combo with taxol. All I can say is, good luck.
1 |& x8 D7 x# W# _Assess Efficacy and Safety of AZD6244 in Combination With Docetaxel in Patients Receiving Second Line Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment. (SELECT-2)
5 I6 e9 G; N+ g. }* E! Z# E- X% g3 GNCT02503358 – combo with taxol again. Good luck again
5 ?" y! `8 x7 Y* t d( v& OSelumetinib and Nab-Paclitaxel (Albumin-stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation) as Second-Line Treatment in Treating Patients With Stage IIIB-IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
$ P2 f4 g1 k7 \0 L% d! d4 o, k/ DNCT02143466 – combo with the famous AZD9291. Good luck 3rd time, AZD!
5 p( c, V2 L5 j2 o& L. b2 c4 A& k1 @AZD9291 in Combination With Ascending Doses of Novel Therapeutics5 K7 I, e) `4 x) i5 X9 c# D: q
NCT02337530 – combo with Alimta + Cisplatin, ouch! You think anyone is going to sign into this horrific triple combo, AZD?; Q# Z T" G" x8 O1 ^
Selumetinib in Patients Receiving Pemetrexed and Cisplatin in Advanced or Metastatic KRAS Wildtype or Unknown Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- y3 r$ t8 m( V9 R" U% \NCT02583542 - AZD2014 is an mTORC inhibitor, something like rapamycin?
- N0 _4 ^$ Q% v" \7 @3 O7 cA Study of AZD2014 in Combination With Selumetinib in Patients With Advanced Cancers (TORCMEK) 2 e0 \- j: |2 W7 G* L: G
NCT02450656 –EGFR-TKi again. Good luck 4th time!
; M* S0 S6 o. r1 ]- d1 r: ]Afatinib and Selumetinib in Advanced KRAS Mutant and PIK3CA Wildtype Colorectal, Non-small Cell Lung and Pancreatic Cancer (M14AFS)
. k. R8 p5 _3 N X: [3 k/ D, n5 O5 B5 u* Z7 T$ O: @ Y
3)
/ p# e; \. V! ^, S( V0 aMEK inhibitor, Cobimetinib, aka XL518 by Exelixis, + ERK inhibitor GDC-0994 by Genentach* F( b) [" P( X" o1 m/ D$ y
3 J' n6 T2 X, B% |
Cobimetinib, combo with vemurafenib (Zelboraf), a Raf inhibitor, is expected to receive FDA decision on melanoma in 2 weeks. Based on what I know, it is likely going to be an approval. Vemurafenib, also by Genentech, is already on the melanoma market. , v& T4 O8 L" Q/ u7 i
- ~4 `7 p) O0 b% Z: t
So, why did Genentech decide to use cobimetinib, in combo with ERK inhibitor GDC-0994, not Raf inhibitor vemurafenib in their “advanced solid tumor including NSCLC” trial, is beyond me. But this trial surely will be interesting to watch. - b# f8 m4 e% R% S5 |5 }: n
9 V4 q$ {0 | m8 u9 q' ^
Did I say I am biased? Here it goes, anything Genentech does, I pay attention. Alright?
6 d/ L. u; ^ g2 w" {; n% C: |3 ~9 q
NCT02457793
1 m L& i8 [' D+ S0 S# aA Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Effects of Cobimetinib and GDC-0994 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Z# l9 [. b# D% B1 g' n9 p/ ]4 C% [7 V% v6 z
4)
& e; O0 b& Y" S( U U: }! vMEK inhibitor, PD0352901 + CDK4/6 inhibitor Palbociclib, by Pfizer
2 m, D" |, m, a5 M7 Z+ R) T6 G0 S8 D6 M$ X
Palbociclib, aka PD-0332991, is already approved for ER (estrogen receptor) positive breast cancer, under commercial name Ibrance. 7 t0 x4 t) K4 l3 z* r- a5 Z
+ k+ v% f: m, l" d" k
Pfizer has already conducted a phase 2 NSCLC trial using Palbociclib – “A phase II clinical trial of the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (PD 0332991) in previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with inactivated CDKN2A”. CDKN2A (p16) inactivation is closely related to CDK4 activation, I believe. This is from ASCO 2014 – “Palbociclib therapy alone was well-tolerated, and stable disease (SD) was achieved in 50% of evaluable patients, suggesting the induction of cellular senescence.”; O ?; u; x/ K* P. S
: h; h, E$ d+ v* B' aEli Lilly has also developed a rather potent CDK4 inhibitor called Abemaciclib, aka LY2835219, and latest data showed that it achieved disease control rate of 58% in KRAS positive NSCLC.
* |( U& r" A/ H
" b' E# C- ?/ u4 Z* SSo, Pfizer decided to put CDK4 inhibitor together with MEK inhibitor, I guess if Pfizer could push effectiveness rate to about or beyond 70%, it will be as big a success as their recent blockbuster crizotinib, which gave me an extra one and half year survival despite some significant but tolerable body damages.
1 B- H4 P$ B' }4 c
5 \4 e- @* C8 u% f( V9 ^0 E. tNCT020229820 w, H9 J8 F; @$ N8 N, r
PALBOCICLIB + PD-0325901 for NSCLC & Solid Tumors( ^( a7 D3 ]# Y* ^9 d/ a
/ L- p3 Y5 V- Y# R' ~; x
5)1 T+ s+ Z8 k3 I
MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, aka MEK162, by Array BioPharma! l" c; b" y, k6 I
7 v, H0 c+ M7 [9 B
Just like Roche/ Genentech has cobimetinib + Vemurafenib, Array BioPharma has binimetinib + encorafenib, in both cases, a MEK inhibitor combo with a Raf inhibitor, against BRAF V600 mutated melanoma. # h6 C0 r* m) |9 z6 N
; W9 B+ g' E4 V$ SMy trial sponsor, Ariad, under financial stress since couple years ago, still has a market cap of about $1.3b. Look at Array BioPharma, just a little more than half of Ariad. Yet, can you believe they are conducting 4 brand new clinical trials on MEK162, two involving NSCLC. And, they are ditching world #1 pharma pirate Novartis! What a show of confidence. I wish this Colorado company and KRAS NSCLC patients best of luck.
- t: `8 M) g, D. ]+ s2 w7 H8 w; N+ y @: x
NCT02185690
& D3 l% k! p6 V G: bA Phase I/Ib Study of MEK162, a MEK Inhibitor, in Combination With Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Patients With Non-squamous Carcinoma of the Lung
% D& p- ]8 @5 E9 u. y5 ENCT02451865% D9 }; o8 N3 C6 m8 v5 l
Binimetinib With Docetaxel in Treating Patients With Previously Treated, Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
/ F0 ^' J9 B: f/ O' Q% Q* q! [2 V$ F
9 O0 [: J, D8 V& c6)
" v- R k5 r/ U8 VTBK1 inhibitor, momelotinib, already covered above; z3 J2 D4 W c3 Q8 u- Q; a0 w- B
6 R5 U) a3 u5 I7)
+ }8 G$ _8 y* l5 n4 p' Z0 r# KERK inhibitor, GDC-0994 , already covered above0 A' S7 }8 ]# X: Q2 R
) K: {$ r+ A+ ~' L- H# a4 L
8): f! N+ O9 p; G2 J ]0 v% b
Raf inhibitor, encorafenib and vemurafenib, already covered above
2 s4 I r$ l2 n, Z+ ?9 {
2 D o L0 Q! L- L; r9)
V- W' C" v* ~- `! UCDK4 inhibitor, Palbociclib and Abemaciclib , already covered above
0 K3 e, Y- a4 z/ k% G" w R! a. g. p7 ]9 E
I’m sure there are things I missed or mistaken so please help append / correct all you can, thanks.6 R5 J1 ^$ p+ @9 Q, _( s( N
8 U) e; t. o+ X' m
https://www.inspire.com/groups/a ... &asat=317910285 |